adversarial data
- Asia > Singapore (0.04)
- Oceania > New Zealand > North Island > Auckland Region > Auckland (0.04)
- Asia > Japan > Honshū > Kantō > Tokyo Metropolis Prefecture > Tokyo (0.04)
- (2 more...)
Probabilistic Margins for Instance Reweighting in Adversarial Training
Reweighting adversarial data during training has been recently shown to improve adversarial robustness, where data closer to the current decision boundaries are regarded as more critical and given larger weights. However, existing methods measuring the closeness are not very reliable: they are discrete and can take only a few values, and they are path-dependent, i.e., they may change given the same start and end points with different attack paths. In this paper, we propose three types of probabilistic margin (PM), which are continuous and path-independent, for measuring the aforementioned closeness and reweighing adversarial data. Specifically, a PM is defined as the difference between two estimated class-posterior probabilities, e.g., such a probability of the true label minus the probability of the most confusing label given some natural data. Though different PMs capture different geometric properties, all three PMs share a negative correlation with the vulnerability of data: data with larger/smaller PMs are safer/riskier and should have smaller/larger weights. Experiments demonstrated that PMs are reliable and PM-based reweighting methods outperformed state-of-the-art counterparts.
Colliding with Adversaries at ECML-PKDD 2025 Model Robustness Competition 1st Prize Solution
Stefanopoulos, Dimitris, Voskou, Andreas
This report presents the winning solution for Task 2 of Colliding with Adversaries: A Challenge on Robust Learning in High Energy Physics Discovery at ECML-PKDD 2025. The goal of the challenge was to design and train a robust ANN-based model capable of achieving high accuracy in a binary classification task on both clean and adversarial data generated with the Random Distribution Shuffle Attack (RDSA). Our solution consists of two components: a data generation phase and a robust model training phase. In the first phase, we produced 15 million artificial training samples using a custom methodology derived from Random Distribution Shuffle Attack (RDSA). In the second phase, we introduced a robust architecture comprising (i)a Feature Embedding Block with shared weights among features of the same type and (ii)a Dense Fusion Tail responsible for the final prediction. Training this architecture on our adversarial dataset achieved a mixed accuracy score of 80\%, exceeding the second-place solution by two percentage points.
- Europe > Middle East > Cyprus > Limassol > Limassol (0.04)
- Europe > Greece > Central Macedonia > Thessaloniki (0.04)
- Asia > Japan > Honshū > Kantō > Tokyo Metropolis Prefecture > Tokyo (0.04)
- North America > United States > Texas > Travis County > Austin (0.04)
- Europe > Russia (0.04)
- (4 more...)
- Asia > Singapore (0.04)
- Oceania > New Zealand > North Island > Auckland Region > Auckland (0.04)
- Asia > Japan > Honshū > Kantō > Tokyo Metropolis Prefecture > Tokyo (0.04)
- (2 more...)
- Asia > China > Jiangsu Province > Nanjing (0.04)
- North America > Canada (0.04)
- Asia > China > Beijing > Beijing (0.04)